Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 OKLA 6 - Krumme v. Walker

Krumme v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1978
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hellman v. Logan · Liles v. Bigpond · Grady v. Rice · Little Nick Oil Co. v. District Judge of Tulsa County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * . The test is to be made by ascertaining who are necessary parties to .the action as it is set forth in the complaint, and what parties are necessary in order to enable the plaintiffs to obtain all the relief which is properly included in the prayer for relief made therein. * * * If one of the parties who are thus made necessary resides in the county in which the action is begun, the action is properly begun and may be properly tried in that county, although the other and principal defendant resides in another county. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.