Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Or. App. 32 - State v. Rumler

199 Or. App. 32 - State v. Rumler’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]wo related questions about preservation that [appellate courts] often ask during oral argument: `If the trial judge were sitting here today, would he or she be surprised by your argument?' And, `If we were to reverse based on your argument, would the trial court feel "blindsided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “that the trial court would be surprised to learn of the state's arguments on appeal and would feel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.