199 Or. App. 566 - State v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[D]efendant renews his argument that the delay in examining the evidence was simply too long to be reasonable. The state responds that, given the time of day, the location of the arrest site, and the risk of loss or contamination by examining the evidence on the street, the fact that the officer waited 20 to 30 minutes before examining it was reasonable. We agree. See, e.g., State v. Zigler , * * * (45-minute delay reasonable when `[t]here is no suggestion in the record or in defendant's argument that the search was deliberately delayed or that the police were doing anything other than necessary and appropriate tasks in the interim')."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Nix

2. “no suggestion in the record or in [the] defendant's argument that the search was deliberately delayed or that the police were doing anything other than necessary and appropriate tasks in the interim.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Nix

3. “because of the delay of 20 to 30 minutes, the search of the knife and the ball were not valid searches incident to arrest.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Nix