Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 So. 2d 129

Schack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1967-04-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1971

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-04-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Through separate informations the appellant was charged with separate offenses of using a fictitious name in the purchase of different motor vehicles on different dates contrary to the provisions of Sec. 319.33 Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty; sentences were pronounced; appeals were filed in each *130case, and the appeals have been consolidated here.

¶2A study of the record discloses that there was substantial evidence to support the verdicts; the jury was fully instructed on the applicable law, and the cases were tried according to law. No error appearing, the judgments are affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and SMITH, D. C., Associate Judge, concur.
/199/so2d/129 · .json · Public domain