Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 So. 2d 321 - Wright v. State

199 So. 2d 321 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State · Dallas v. State · Schang v. State · Sandlin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he law presumes that a child of such immature age is incapable of either consenting to or protesting against the act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 443 So. 2d 178 - Lanier v. State
  2. “whoever ... unlawfully or carnally knows and abuses a female child under the age of ten years”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 561 So. 2d 333 - McGahee v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.