Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 SO2D 475 - Chatman v. State

Chatman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1982
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1982

3 state decisions

10196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 166 So. 2d 131 - Lee v. State · 148 So. 2d 526 - Child v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think that in accordance with our decision in Lee et al. v. State, 166 So.2d 131 , once the plea of guilty was entered it was the judge’s sole responsibility to fix the punishment. * * * “The court after an extensive pre-sentence investigation and an investigation by the Parole Commission condemned the defendant to death.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.