Ruiz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 1971
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · 54 So. 2d 190 - Mixon v. State · 118 So. 2d 792 - State v. Smith · 155 So. 2d 719 - Urga v. State · Belger v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The evidence was to the effect that he had a key to Rodriguez’ apartment, had spent a night there on occasion and that some articles belonging to him (glasses, water container, towels) were in Rodriguez’ apartment. That showing did not meet the requirement that to enjoy standing to challenge the search of the Rodriguez apartment, it was incumbent upon Ruiz to show he was the owner, lessee, or lawful occupant of the premises searched, as held in Mixon v. State, Fla. 1951, 54 So. 2d 190, 192 ; State v. Smith, Fla. App. 1960, 118 So. 2d 792 ; McCain v. State, Fla. App 1963, 151 So. 2d 841 ; Robinson v. State, Fla. App. 1967, 194 So. 2d 29 . Cf. State v. Leveson, Fla. 1963, 151 So. 2d 283 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kluck v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.