199 So. 2d 97 - Orlowitz v. Orlowitz’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably Cersosimo v. Cersosimo (1982), 616 So. 2d 436 - Miller v. Schou (1993)
1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 50 So. 2d 169 - Jacobs v. Jacobs · 182 So. 2d 498 - Parker v. Parker · Orlowitz v. Orlowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here are no doubt many instances in which a court should exercise its power to protect a party against an unwarranted disclosure of the details of his financial holdings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A dependent wife and child in a divorce suit necessarily make the husband's income and assets material and relevant to the suit's subject matter, and, in the instant case relevant to the pending issues, as the breadwinner's financial abilities are prime ingredients in the equation used to determine the amount and kind of financial relief to be afforded. The question though in this appeal is whether or not the dependents are entitled to the detailed facts as concerns the husband's financial position in the face of the husband's naked assertion as above set forth. We must say, based upon our understanding of the Rules and the philosophy behind them, that we do not look with favor upon the husband's position in not wishing to reveal any of the details of his financial position and his effort to bridle the dependents' discovery rights by substituting his secondary non-verifiable conclusion in lieu of primary detailed facts. The adversary and the court are entitled to the whole factual picture to the end that an independent complete understanding and evaluation may be had." Id. at 500 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“prevented the wife's requiring the husband to produce evidence or answer questions which would reflect on the issues of his residency and commission of adultery by him with an alleged secretary,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.