Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 So. 2d 99

State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 24, 1967

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1967-05-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1972

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

¶2It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
/199/so2d/99 · .json · Public domain