Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 So. 3d 1138

In re Mole

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 23, 2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2016-09-23

Decided 2016-09-23

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

¶2| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice and implied an ability to improp*1139erly influence a judge, in violation of Rules 8.4(d) and 8.4(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Joseph N. Mole, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9588, be suspended from the practice of law for one year, with all but six months deferred.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/199/so3d/1138 · .json · Public domain