Stroope v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc. · 808 So. 2d 294 - SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond · 817 So. 2d 69 - Campbell v. Melton · 311 So. 2d 248 - Sliman v. McBee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the buyer fails to pay the price, the seller may sue for dissolution of the sale. If the seller has given credit for the price and transfers that credit to another person, the right of dissolution is transferred together with the credit. In case of multiple credit holders all must join in the suit for dissolution, but if any credit holder refuses to join, the others may subrogate themselves to his right by paying the amount due to him. If a promissory note or other instrument has been given for the price, the right to dissolution prescribes at the same time and in the same period as the note or other instrument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. Hill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.