Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 VA 243 - Seaboard Ice Co. v. Lee

Seaboard Ice Co. v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably 59 Cal. 2d 97 - Casey v. Proctor (1963), Williams v. Glash (1990)

36 state decisions

180195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griscom v. Childress · Clay v. Landreth · First National Exchange Bank v. Roanoke Oil Co. · Millman v. Swan · Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““it is difficult to formulate fixed rules relating to the avoidance of a release of a claim for personal injuries on the ground of mistake. There are so many factors to be considered that general rules are likely to be inaccurate or misleading. Each case must be determined under the particular circumstances attending the formulation and execution of the contract. * *” 199 Va. at 251 , 99 S.E.2d at 726 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The material facts clearly and conclusively show that the minds of the parties did not meet upon the understanding that the consideration mentioned in the release was intended to be in full settlement of the releasee’s liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.