Arndt v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2009
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Papenthien v. Coerper · State Bank of Waupun v. Storm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the statutory provisions for homestead exemption have been and should be very liberally construed ... yet in a situation such as was here presented there was lacking the prime requisite of a showing of some overt act indicating a then present intention to set aside the particular property as and for a homestead in addition to a showing of a merely mental attitude to the same purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheldon v. Johnston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.