199 Wis. 2d 23 - State v. Schaller’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2012
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. Williams · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss · 120 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Haseltine · 165 Wis. 2d 585 - Burkes v. Hales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that [Wendy] Mow-Taira was properly allowed to testify regarding the effects of domestic violence and, in particular, that victims of domestic violence often recant allegations of abuse. .... “[This type of testimony] is not evidence that the victim suffers from a specific medical or psychological condition—or even that the victim’s behavior as observed by the experts was consistent with the behavior of women suffering from such a condition. It is simply testimony, based on the witnesses’ experience in cases of domestic violence, that women "with a history of domestic abuse often exhibit common traits, among them denial and a tendency to recant accusation of abuse.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark · State v. Ito“When the state manifests an intent during its case-in-chief to present testimony of one or more experts, who have personally examined a victim of an alleged sexual assault, and will testify that the victim's behavior is consistent with the behaviors of other victims of sexual assault, a defendant may request a psychological examination of the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rizzo“evaluat[e] . . . her present functioning and .. . her past experiences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rizzo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.