Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Wis. 2d 654 - State v. Harrell

199 Wis. 2d 654 - State v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably 387 Wis. 2d 552 - Kristi Koschkee v. Carolyn Stanford Taylor (2019), State v. Carprue (2004)

44 state decisions

1901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Berger v. United States · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “limited to establishing whether the judge made a determination requiring disqualification.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Any judge shall disqualify himself or herself from any civil or criminal action or proceeding when one of the following situations occurs:... (g) [w]hen a judge determines that, for any reason, he or she cannot, or it appears he or she cannot, act in an impartial manner."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “up to the judge's own determination. This provision 'leaves the responsibility of withdrawal to the integrity of the individual judge.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.