Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 W. Va. 111 - State v. Penwell

199 W. Va. 111 - State v. Penwell’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2017

15 state decisions

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 192 W. Va. 165 - State v. Derr · State ex rel. Hardesty v. Aracoma—Chief Logan No. 4523 · Slack v. Jacob · 187 W. Va. 136 - State v. Gill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing federal authority relating to severance of multiple counts, this Court notes that it is widely recognized that prejudice is not present under the "other crimes" rule if evidence of each of the crimes charged would be admissible in a separate trial for the other. See C.A. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal 2d § 222 (1982).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If any person in the commission of, or attempt to commit a felony, unlawfully shoot, stab, cut or wound another person, he shall be guilty of a felony, and, upon conviction, shall, in the discretion of the court, either be confined in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than ten years, or be confined in jail not exceeding one year and be fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Even where joinder or consolidation of offenses is proper under the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure, the trial court may order separate trials pursuant to Rule 14(a) on the ground that such joinder or consolidation is prejudicial. The decision to grant a motion for severance pursuant to W.Va. R.Crim. P. 14(a) is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.