1994 OHIO 230 - State v. Harper

              OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio
are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992,
pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas
J. Moyer.
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your
comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
     NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Harper, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Harper (1994),     Ohio St.3d    .]
Criminal law -- Motion to suppress -- Accused must state the
     motion's legal and factual basis with sufficient
     particularity to place prosecutor and court on notice of
     issues to be decided.
     (No. 94-470 -- Submitted August 31, 1994 -- Decided
Septmeber 28, 1994.)
     Certified by the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No.
CA93-07-055.

     Timothy A. Oliver, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney,
Carolyn A. Duvelius and Kenneth A. Ewing, Assistant Prosecuting
Attorneys, for appellee.
     Rittgers & Mengle, Charles H. Rittgers and W. Andrew
Hasselbach, for appellant.

     The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the
authority of State v. Shindler (1994),

70 Ohio St.3d 54

,
N.E.2d    , and the cause is remanded to the trial court for
further proceedings.
     Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E.
Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.