Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1994 Ohio 249

Sabo v. Schott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1994

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1994-10-11

Employer and employee - Claim of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.

Decided 1994-10-11

              OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio
are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992,
pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas
J. Moyer.
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your
comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
     NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Sabo, Appellant, v. Schott et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Sabo v. Schott (1994),     Ohio St.3d    .]
Employer and employee -- Claim of wrongful discharge in violation
     of public policy.
     (No. 94-909 -- Submitted August 31, 1994 -- Decided October
12, 1994.)
     Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No.
C-920941.

     Katz, Greenberger & Norton and Stephen A. Imm, for
appellant.
     Martin, Bailey & MacDonald and Stephen A. Bailey, for
appellees.

     The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed.
Plaintiff's allegation that he was fired as a result of having
testified truthfully, albeit unfavorably to the defendants, if
proven to be true, would constitute conduct on the part of the
defendants which violates the public policy of this state. This
cause is remanded to the trial court to apply Painter v. Graley
(1994),      Ohio St.3d   ,     N.E.2d    .
     Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer,
JJ., concur.
     Douglas, J., dissents.
     F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.

/1994/ohio/249 · .json · Public domain