Piphus v. Blum

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




           [THE STATE EX REL.] PIPHUS ET AL. v. BLUM, CHIEF, ET AL.
                      [Cite as Piphus v. Blum, 

.]
Motions to dismiss granted.
        (No. 94-1804—Submitted April 4, 1995—Decided May 10, 1995.)
                                     IN PROHIBITION.
                                  __________________
        Lawson & McLean, Kenneth L. Lawson and James E. McLean, for relators.
        Manley, Burke, Fischer & Lipton, Co., L.P.A., Timothy M. Burke and
Andrew S. Lipton, for respondents Donald Blum, Chief of Police, Mark Reiber,
Brian Blum, Scott Whitsken and John Does I through III, Officers of the Lockland
Police Force.
        Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip L.
Zorn, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent Hamilton County Court
of Appeals.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The cause is before the court on respondents' motions to dismiss. The
motions are granted and the cause is dismissed.
        MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
        DOUGLAS, J., dissents.
        WRIGHT, J., dissents and would grant the writ.
                                  __________________