Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1995 Ohio 88

State v. Harper

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1995

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1995-10-18

Criminal procedure—Motion to suppress is proper pretrial procedure for challenging the admissibility of breathalyzer test results.

Relies on State v. French · 74 Ohio St. 3d 2 - State v. Harper

Decided 1995-10-18

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
74 Ohio St.3d 2
.]




             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HARPER, APPELLEE.
                       [Cite as State v. Harper, 
1995-Ohio-88
.]
Criminal procedure—Motion to suppress is proper pretrial procedure for
        challenging the admissibility of breathalyzer test results.
  (No. 95-1054—Submitted September 12, 1995—Decided October 18, 1995.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Logan County, No. CA94-08-8014.
                                   _________________
        William T. Goslee, Chief City Prosecutor, for appellant.
        David R. Evans, for appellee.
                                   _________________
        {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.
        {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
State v. French (1995), 
72 Ohio St.3d 446
, 
650 N.E.2d 887
.
        MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
        DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and RESNICK, JJ., dissent.
                                  __________________

/1995/ohio/88 · .json · Public domain