Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1995 Ohio 91

State v. McGlaughlin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1995

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1995-11-22

Witnesses—Criminal law—Trial court may exclude person from appearing as a witness on behalf of a criminal defendant at trial if court determines that witness will not offer any testimony, but merely intends to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

Relies on State v. Phillips · State v. Kirk

Decided 1995-11-22

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
74 Ohio St.3d 72
.]




        THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCGLAUGHLIN, APPELLEE.
                   [Cite as State v. McGlaughlin, 
1995-Ohio-91
.]
Witnesses—Criminal law—Trial court may exclude person from appearing as a
        witness on behalf of a criminal defendant at trial if court determines that
        witness will not offer any testimony, but merely intends to assert the Fifth
        Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
   (No. 94-961—Submitted October 11, 1995—Decided November 22, 1995.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93AP-1109.
                                  _________________
        Michael Miller, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katherine
Press, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
        Dye & Fleck, Lewis William Dye and William J. Fleck, Jr., for appellee.
                                  _________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of
the trial court is reinstated on the authority of State v. Kirk (1995), 
72 Ohio St.3d 564
, 
651 N.E.2d 981
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and
COOK, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1995/ohio/91 · .json · Public domain