Witnesses—Criminal law—Trial court may exclude person from appearing as a witness on behalf of a criminal defendant at trial if court determines that witness will not offer any testimony, but merely intends to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCGLAUGHLIN, APPELLEE.
[Cite as State v. McGlaughlin,
1995-Ohio-91
.]
Witnesses—Criminal law—Trial court may exclude person from appearing as a
witness on behalf of a criminal defendant at trial if court determines that
witness will not offer any testimony, but merely intends to assert the Fifth
Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
(No. 94-961—Submitted October 11, 1995—Decided November 22, 1995.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93AP-1109.
_________________
Michael Miller, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katherine
Press, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Dye & Fleck, Lewis William Dye and William J. Fleck, Jr., for appellee.
_________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of
the trial court is reinstated on the authority of State v. Kirk (1995),