State v. Paxton

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PAXTON, APPELLEE.
                      [Cite as State v. Paxton, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
  (No. 95-1340—Submitted September 24, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.)
       APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-93-227.
                                  __________________
        Anthony G. Pizza, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and J. Christopher
Anderson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
        Britz & Zemmelman and Norman G. Zemmelman; and John A. Coble, for
appellee.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, KLINE, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        ROGER L. KLINE, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J.
                                  __________________