Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1996 Ohio 342

Columbus v. Copley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1996

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1996-11-06

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

Decided 1996-11-06

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
77 Ohio St.3d 1202
.]




             CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. COPLEY, APPELLANT.
                   [Cite as Columbus v. Copley, 
1996-Ohio-342
.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
    (No. 95-1828—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.)
   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC06-756.
                                 __________________
        Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and
Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee.
        Max Kravitz, for appellant.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                 __________________

/1996/ohio/342 · .json · Public domain