State v. Moore

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MOORE, APPELLANT.
                      [Cite as State v. Moore, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
    (No. 95-1993—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.)
   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC03-388.
                                  __________________
        Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and
Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee.
        Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., and Daniel D. Connor, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________