Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) does not violate the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at
76 Ohio St.3d 24
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DEVOISE, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. DeVoise,
1996-Ohio-428
.]
Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) does not violate the due process
or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.
(No. 95-343—Submitted June 5, 1996—Decided July 3, 1996.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 14701.
__________________
Daniel E. Kinane, Montgomery County Public Defender, and Charles L.
Grove, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals, upholding the constitutionality
of R.C. 2925.11(F)(1), is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompkins (1996),