Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1996 Ohio 428

State v. DeVoise

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1996-07-03

Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) does not violate the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. DeVoise

Decided 1996-07-03

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
76 Ohio St.3d 24
.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DEVOISE, APPELLANT.
                      [Cite as State v. DeVoise, 
1996-Ohio-428
.]
Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) does not violate the due process
        or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.
          (No. 95-343—Submitted June 5, 1996—Decided July 3, 1996.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 14701.
                                  __________________
        Daniel E. Kinane, Montgomery County Public Defender, and Charles L.
Grove, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals, upholding the constitutionality
of R.C. 2925.11(F)(1), is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompkins (1996),
75 Ohio St.3d 558
, 
664 N.E.2d 926
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1996/ohio/428 · .json · Public domain