1996 OHIO 435 - State v. Gingerich

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at

76 Ohio St.3d 24

.]




           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GINGERICH, APPELLANT.
                    [Cite as State v. Gingerich,

1996-Ohio-435

.]
Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.14(H) do not violate
        the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States
        Constitutions.
          (No. 95-1570—Submitted June 5, 1996—Decided July 3, 1996.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA94-11-099.)
                                  __________________
        Tim Oliver, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carolyn A. Duvelius,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Eddie Lawson, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals, upholding the constitutionality
of R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.14(H), is affirmed on the authority of State v.
Thompkins (1996)

75 Ohio St.3d 558

664 N.E.2d 926

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________