Ford v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 13 · 25 U.S.C. § 1616 · 25 U.S.C. § 450 (§ 2 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 25 U.S.C. § 450B (§ 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 25 U.S.C. § 450F (§ 102 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 25 U.S.C. § 450G · 25 U.S.C. § 47
Relies on Lehman v. Nakshian · Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company · Bego v. Gordon · Morgan v. Baldwin · Ducheneaux v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Casazza v. State · Horne v. Crozier“The Secretary is directed, upon the request of any Indian tribe by tribal resolution, to enter into a self-determination contract or contracts with a tribal organization to plan, conduct, and administer programs or portions thereof....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When there is an ambiguous contract, evidence may be introduced to determine the intention of the parties, which is a question of fact to be resolved by the fact finder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.