State v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2017
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bell v. Wolfish · Benton v. Maryland · Meachum v. Fano · Payne v. Tennessee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mere fact that a sanction imposed by prison officials has a punitive component does not mean that the sanction constitutes `punishment' for double jeopardy purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Hernandez“Prison discipline allows correction authorities to achieve a valid remedial goalthe maintenance of prison security and order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Hernandez“within the meaning of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Hernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.