Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1996 SD 96 - State v. Barber

State v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2013

20 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huddleston v. United States · United States v. Monzon · State v. Floody · 168 Wis. 2d 970 - State v. Williams · State v. Rufener

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a judicial mind in view of the law and the circumstances could [not] have reached the same conclusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.