Kubik v. Streule’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co. · 33 Mass. App. Ct. 18 - Hull v. Attleboro Savings Bank · Shuman v. Stanley Works · Scalia v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · 33 Mass. App. Ct. 147 - Mazzoleni v. Cotton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[gjood cause is ‘a stringent standard requiring diligenjt]’ albeit unsuccessful effort to complete service within the period prescribed by the rule. ... “The focus of the court’s inquiry [as to good cause] is the reasonableness and diligence of counsel’s effort to effect service within the time required’ (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hinton v. Lipis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.