Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1997 ME 88 - Gagne v. Stevens

Gagne v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2014

4 district · 4 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craig v. Zelian · Michelson v. Sherman · Tzitzon Realty Co. Inc. v. Mustonen · 35 Mass. App. Ct. 705 - Simon v. Simon · Pick v. Bartel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[SJpecific performance of a contract that does not satisfy the statute of frauds is warranted only “if it is established that the party seeking enforcement, in reasonable reliance on the contract and on the continuing assent of the party against whom enforcement is sought, has so changed his position that injustice can be avoided only by specific enforcement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Promissory estoppel may be invoked when a “promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.