Ehrman v. Feist’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2025
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olson v. Fraase · Continental Casualty Co. v. Kinsey · First American Bank West v. Berdahl · State v. Christensen · Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood Plaza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““‘Absent an abuse of discretion, a trial court’s determination on the relevance of evidence will not be reversed on appeal.’ Ingalls v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Group, 1997 ND 43, ¶23 , 561 N.W.2d 273 . “We will not overturn a trial court’s admission or exclusion of evidence unless the trial court abused its discretion.’ Id: at ¶20 [ 561 N.W.2d 273 ], ‘A trial court abuses its discretion when it acts in an arbitrary or capricious manner, or misapplies or misinterprets the law.’ State v. Christensen, 1997 N.D. 57 , ¶ 5, 561 N.W.2d 631 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.