Kluck v. Kluck’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Kautzman v. Kautzman (1998), Fox v. Fox (1999)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · Bennett v. Arkansas · Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund · Van Oosting v. Van Oosting · Olson v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court finds that a parent has perpetrated domestic violence and that parent does not have custody, and there exists one incident of domestic violence which resulted in serious bodily injury or involved the use of a dangerous weapon or there exists a pattern of domestic violence within a reasonable time proximate- to the proceeding, the court shall allow .only supervised child visitation with that parent unless there is a showing by clear and convincing evidence that unsupervised visitation would not endanger the child’s physical or emotional health.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Zuger v. Zuger · Sevland v. Sevland“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise. N.D.R.Ev. 702.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]vidence Rule 702 does not require licensure in a particular field, or licensure in the court's jurisdiction, to qualify as an expert”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.