Scott v. Spearman

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




              SCOTT ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. SPEARMAN, APPELLEE.
                    [Cite as Scott v. Spearman, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
         (No. 96-963—Submitted June 11, 1997—Decided July 30, 1997.)
      APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 95 CA 55.
                                 ___________________
        Bricker & Eckler, Drew H. Campbell and Michael D. Smith, for appellants.
        William C. Hayes and W. Scott Hayes, for appellee.
                                 ___________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                 ___________________