Didier v. Johns

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                 DIDIER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHNS, APPELLEE.
                      [Cite as Didier v. Johns, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
        (No. 96-1509—Submitted June 10, 1997—Decided July 30, 1997.)
   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA 15602.
                                 ___________________
        Thomas J. Manning Co., L.P.A., and Thomas J. Manning; Dwight D.
Brannon & Associates and Dwight D. Brannon, for appellants.
        Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., John T. McLandrich and Robert H.
Stoffers, for appellee.
                                 ___________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                 ___________________