State ex rel. Grinnell v. Mitchell

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                THE STATE EX REL. GRINNELL v. MITCHELL, JUDGE.
             [Cite as State ex rel. Grinnell v. Mitchell, 

.]
Motion to dismiss granted.
       (No. 97-131—Submitted March 18, 1997—Decided April 30, 1997.)
                                     IN PROCEDENDO.
                                ON MOTION TO DISMISS.
                                  __________________
          Timothy Grinnell, pro se.
          Mark E. Piepmeier, Special Prosecuting Attorney, and William E. Breyer,
Assistant Special Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
                                  __________________
          {¶ 1} The motion to dismiss is granted.
          MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and, JJ.,
concur.
          LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs separately.
                                  __________________
          LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurring.
          {¶ 2} I concur in the order of dismissal. Although we are not directing the
lower court to take immediate action in this matter, I strongly urge the trial count
to take note that relator’s motion has been pending for nearly one year and to make
the utmost effort to expeditiously rule on this motion.
                                  __________________