Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1997 OK 91 - Harmon v. Harmon

Harmon v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2023

21 state decisions

1101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Chad S. · Clark v. Clark · Casper v. Casper · Johnson v. Scott · Malone v. Malone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The instant matter does not involve the potential for the termination of . . . parental rights concerning the minor child of the marriage, i.e. a situation where this Court has generally indicated a right to counsel for indigent parents exists. We do not believe [the parent in question] has a constitutionally protected right to counsel in this divorce case merely because it involves property issues and issues concerning custody/visitation with a minor child. See Haller v. Haller , 168 Mich. App. 198 , 423 N.W.2d 617 (1988) (no due process right to counsel in divorce case merely because issues therein concern custody of minor child).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We, therefore, can see no harmful error in upholding the trial court's granting of a divorcee based on the counterclaim as it concerns the parties' status and the dissolution of the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.