State v. Benallie’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Florida v. Jimeno · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · 119 Ill. 2d 542 - Harris v. Walker · United States v. Rubio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's findings of fact from a suppression hearing must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.... This court's function under the clearly erroneous standard is to determine whether the decision of the lower court lacks the support of substantial evidence, evolves from an erroneous view of the applicable law or whether, considering the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. In making this determination, we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court's decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Meyer“We are unpersuaded that a consent search may be validly qualified by the number of officers allowed to search, and we so hold. Once consent has been obtained from one with authority to give it, any expectation of privacy has been lost. We seriously doubt that the entry of additional officers would further diminish the eonsenter’s expectation of privacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.