State v. Hoxsie’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2011
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffith v. Kentucky · Poulos v. State of New Hampshire · Dove v. United States · 116 S. Ct. 701 - Spicer v. United States · Durham v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhere is no statute or provision of the state constitution that provides for disposition of a criminal appeal in the event of the death of a defendant pending that appeal. Our state’s statutes allowing substitution of a party in the event of the party’s death, SDCL 15-6-25(a) — (e), have heretofore been applied only to civil litigation and, under the present statutory scheme, cannot be construed to apply to criminal appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Korsen“Mere dismissal of the appeal, without abatement of the proceedings ab initio, would permit a judgment to stand that is not final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Abatement Effects Of Accused's Death Before Appellate Review of Federal Criminal Conviction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.