Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1997 SD 69 - Voeltz v. John Morrell & Co.

Voeltz v. John Morrell & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2011

10 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Withrow v. Larkin · Gibson v. Berryhill · Pepsico, Inc. v. McMillen · Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin Lakes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Consequently, the circumstances and facts of each situation should control whether disqualification is required. If circumstances show a likely capacity to tempt the official to depart from his duty, then the risk of actual bias is unacceptable and the conflict of interest is sufficient to disqualify the official.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “`whether the record establishes either actual bias on the part of the tribunal or the existence of circumstances that lead to the conclusion that an unacceptable risk of actual bias or prejudgment inhered in the tribunal's procedure.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “is that the official should be disqualified only when there has been a clear and convincing showing the official has an unalterably closed mind on matters critical to the disposition of the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.