State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2024
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Arizona v. Fulminante · United States v. Hasting
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“throughout the trial, and there was never a question that McFarland was a law enforcement officer in the performance of his duties on the night in question. Moreover, the fact that the victim was a law enforcement officer in the performance of his duties was not disputed by Burdick at the sentencing hearing nor is it in dispute on this appeal. Thus, we are satisfied, beyond a reasonable doubt that the record does not contain evidence that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burdick“§ 253. Gross sexual assault 1. A person is guilty of gross sexual assault if that person engages in a sexual act with another person and: B. The other person, not the actor’s spouse, has not in fact attained the age of 14 years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Howe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.