State v. Thibert’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Brander · State v. Reams · State v. Steinmetz · State v. Cooney · State v. Beckman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the purpose of determining the number of convictions under this section,.... An offender is considered to have been previously convicted for the purposes of this section if less than 5 years have elapsed between the commission of the present offense and a previous conviction. If there has been no additional conviction for an offense under this section for a period of 5 years after a prior conviction hereunder, then all records and data relating to the prior conviction are confidential criminal justice information ... and public access to the information may only be obtained by district court order upon good cause shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Weldele
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.