Barnett v. Hunsaker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Olson v. Jude (2003), State v. Bullman (2009)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steer, Inc. v. Department of Revenue · Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Desaye · Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc. · Daines v. Knight · Columbia Grain International v. Cereck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the district court misapprehended the effect of the evidence, or if, after reviewing the record, this Court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miles v. Blue“does not need to be expressed in any particular form.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.