Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 MT 340 - State v. DeVore

State v. DeVore’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably State v. Jefferson (2003), State v. Heath (2004)

44 state decisions

2801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · United States v. Allsup · State v. Sullivan · Great Falls Tribune v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District · State v. Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “coaxed recantations of admissions of bias are merely fodder for appeal.... It is not a district court's role to rehabilitate jurors whose spontaneous, and thus most reliable and honest, responses on voir dire expose a serious question about their ability to be fair and impartial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a state of mind in reference to the case or to either of the parties that would prevent the juror from acting with entire impartiality and without prejudice to the substantial rights of either party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “coaxed recantations of admissions of bias are merely fodder for appeal and ultimately the source of major expense and inconvenience. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.