Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Henricksen v. State (2004), Prindel v. Ravalli County (2006)
4 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sisson v. Ruby · Gibbs v. Ernst · Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc. · Bruner v. Yellowstone County · Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a. the defendant made a representation as to a past or existing material fact; b. the representation must have been untrue; c. regardless of its actual belief, the defendant must have made the representation without any reasonable ground for believing it to be true; d. the representation must have been made with the intent to induce the plaintiff to rely on it; e. the plaintiff must háve been unaware of the falsity of the representation; it must have acted in reliance upon the truth of the representation and it must have been justified in relying upon the representation; f. the plaintiff, as a result of its reliance, must sustain damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.