Ash v. Traynor’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2015
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau · Johnson v. Elkin · Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau · Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau · Nemec v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This section applies to all persons who begin receiving social security retirement benefits or other retirement benefits in lieu of social security retirement benefits, or who attain retirement age for social security retirement benefits unless the employee proves the employee is not eligible to receive social security retirement benefits or other benefits in lieu of social security retirement benefits, after July 31, 1995.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a worker currently receiving benefits had a significant property right in continuation of those benefits, and an expectation those benefits would continue. ... [T]he right to receive continuing workers compensation disability benefits by a worker already receiving them is a property right subject to due process protection, and that the claimant has `a right to rely upon continuing, regular, ongoing payments.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“and to preclude the Bureau from relitigating claims, absent new evidence or a change in medical condition of the claimant. Gregory, 1998 ND 94, ¶ 31 , 578 N.W.2d 101 . The 1997 amendments to N.D.C.C. § 65-05-09.3(2) cannot retrospectively change the Bureau's obligation. Id. at ¶ 25 (stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.