Nesseth v. Omlid’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2021
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Andrews v. O'HEARN · 172 Ill. 2d 438 - Snover v. McGraw · Okken v. Okken · Hoge v. Hoge · Stoner v. Nash Finch, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In arriving at the amount of your verdict for damages arising from personal injury, you may consider ... the following ... claimed detriment proximately resulting from the injury in question: A. Medical Expense 1. The reasonable value, not exceeding the actual cost to the plaintiff, of examinations, attention and care by doctors, services of nurses, attendants and others, transportation, hospital accommodations, x-ray pictures, medicine, therapeutic devices and other supplies, if any, reasonably required and actually provided in treating the plaintiff; and 2. The reasonable value of medical, surgical, hospital, and other services, care, and supplies that will be required in the future treatment of the plaintiff. ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Barta v. Hinds“The test is whether no reconciliation of the jury's answers is possible and the inconsistency is such that the special verdict will not support the judgment entered below or any other judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Barta v. Hinds“`[I]t would be an invasion of the jury's function for the court to direct the finding of a certain amount.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rittenour v. Gibson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.