State ex rel. Mitchell v. Indus. Comm.

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




 THE STATE EX REL. MITCHELL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
                                    OHIO, APPELLEE.
           [Cite as State ex rel. Mitchell v. Indus. Comm., 

.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
    (No. 97-2635—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 21, 1998.)
  APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD11-1554.
                                  __________________
        Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for
appellant.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cecille Caluya Harris,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the
opinion of the court of appeals.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of
appeals.
                                  __________________