Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 548

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-06-03

On application for reinstatement.

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer · In re Resignation of Gambino

Decided 1998-06-03

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
82 Ohio St.3d 1216
.]




                  OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOLZER.
             [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer, 
1998-Ohio-548
.]
                (No. 96-1965—Submitted and decided June 3, 1998.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent Richard Jean Holzer, Attorney
Registration No. 0018814,
 last known address in Englewood, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 30, 1997, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of
one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with
the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by the court that Richard Jean Holzer be, and hereby
is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified cost of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer (1997), 
78 Ohio St.3d 309
, 
677 N.E.2d 1186
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/548 · .json · Public domain