State v. Hurston

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HURSTON, APPELLANT.
                     [Cite as State v. Hurston, 

.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Rush.
   (No. 97-2677—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.)
   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA-16217.
                                  __________________
        Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Karen L. Sollars, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Raymond Hurston, pro se.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Rush (1998), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________